This is a highly personal list. Well, I guess most book lists are highly personal. I have yet to see a book list that actually claims to be objectively best in any topic. My advice is this: read what you like and disregard the rest. Life’s too short to spend it with bad books.
Although, I do recommend that if possible read multiple books on the same topic. No book on it’s own is perfect but in unision multiple books can give a more complete view of a specific topic. For instance, this is a neat way to learn difficult mathematical concepts. Sometimes an explanation from one book might resonate better with you than another.
LAYMN is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
“Bad Science” is what got me interested in statistics and good science in general. Ben Goldacre is a british medical doctor, researcher, academic and science writer.
His book is on a variety of topics but can be covered under the unifying umbrella concept: misleading pseudoscience that is deliberately marketed to the masses in order to sell supplements.
Much like the book “How to lie with statistics” but through the lense of medicine and big pharma.
It’s funny, when I studied computer science and chemistry it never occoured to me to ask myself “what is science?” Because in computer science and chemistry it’s quite self-evident if something doesn’t work.
When I started studying psychology, I was curious about what science was beyond the four step process of how to think like a scientist. This is one of the first books I read in my quest to understand more.
In short this book is mostly about having realistic expectations about scientists, yourself as a researcher and Wilson’s own journey from his childhood to present day.
I have a tendency to read from a variety of fields. In 2020, I chose 3 books from history as my summer reading. In Defence of History by Richard J. Evans was almost exactly what I wanted.
It didn’t propose a grand unified theory of history but rather a meta analysis of history as discipline and whether it was scientific or not. It confirmed for me that science isn’t just one scientific method. There are more ways than one to skin a cat.
Although supposedly philosophy of science has evolved past Popper’s falsification, and I don’t think that’s necessarily a good thing, there’s still wisdom and insight for a curious mind in this masterpiece.
My favorite idea from Popper is this:
‘Our advantage is that we can let our ideas die in our stead.’
A fair warning thought: it may be a bit dry or irrelevant occasionally.
I’m a huge fan of Feynman. His clarity of thought, dedication to scientific thinking and most importantly empirical insight, that complements a philosopher of science like, Karl R. Popper, rather well.
A comprehensive online resource if you want to get into physics. The text is written extremely well so even a layman can understand. If you want to get your own physical copy then I suggest you get an older print than a new set.
Errata needs to be addressed but you can find a list here.
This is a fairly short read, but it’s tense on substance while still easy to understand. It gives a bird’s-eye view of science and scientists.
Particularly useful for someone who’s new to to the field. Someone who may have some naive thoughts about the scientific enterprise. But even if you are more along your way as a scientist, there are some novel thoughts that you may find enlightening.
- There are many books on science. Pick up as many books as you can and focus on the ones that you actually enjoy.
- You might want to find the “best science book” but there is no such thing. Yet. All I have read have their perks and shortcomings. So just start somewhere and keep on reading until you are able to form your own idea of what science is or isn’t.